Court Denies Water Users’ Just Compensation Claims in Takings Case

Court Denies Water Users’ Just Compensation Claims in Takings Case

Western Water Law challenged in the process

Klamath Falls, OR – After fifteen years of litigation, culminating in a lengthy trial last January that brought over 25 Klamath Project water users to Washington, DC, the United Stated Court of Federal Claims judge hearing the “Takings Case” ruled in favor of the United States. The water users sought just compensation for taking of their water rights in 2001 when the United States reallocated irrigation water to threatened and endangered species under the Endangered Species Act. Judge Marian Blank Horn’s 75 page opinion, which was filed on September 29, concluded that, “The government’s actions in 2001, did not, therefore, constitute a taking of these plaintiffs’ property under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution or effect an impairment of their rights under the Klamath Compact.”

Read More

Court Rules No Compensation for Klamath Irrigators Due to Superior Tribal Rights

Court Rules No Compensation for Klamath Irrigators Due to Superior Tribal Rights

Washington, DC – On September 29, U.S. Court of Claims Judge Marian Blank Horn resoundingly re-affirmed the superiority of the senior water rights of the Klamath Tribes and downriver Klamath Basin tribes over other water interests in the Klamath Basin.

In the case decided Friday, the Klamath Reclamation Project irrigators sought nearly $30 million in compensation from the United States government because of the Bureau of Reclamation’s curtailment of Project water deliveries during a severe drought in 2001. The irrigators argued that the government’s actions constituted a “taking” of their property under the Fifth Amendment to the United States’ Constitution, by depriving them of their alleged rights to use Klamath Project water. In accordance with...

Read More